Both Sides are Wrong - The Third Way

The debate of CO2 is being used to promote technology that certain people make a lot of money on.  The goal is money and control.  Those who control energy control the people.  Even the US Dollar is based in oil.  

New Engine Type is about giving control to YOU, not some oligarchy or cabal who gets rich from you via government regulations that serve their interest making them rich and you poor.

There are three sides to this issue.  Old Oil/fossil fuels, Green New Deal/great reset, and the third way...

Oil/Fossil Fuel Side: This is the old IC piston engine/turbine tech with oil/gas fuels of gasoline, Diesel, Jet and Natural Gas.  This also includes coal electric generation.  Certain cartels own rights to oil/gas/coal and the technology related to it and make lots of money on keeping things with fossil  based fuels expensive to you.  Some on this oil side of the debate says (correctly) that CO2 does NOT control the temperature of earth and man makes so little CO2 as to only be beneficial.  Some in the oil industry have "bought into" the lie of CO2 and use it to sell more Natural Gas in mass.   Coal is caught in competition with Natural Gas due to the lower CO2 in NG compared to Coal.  

Both factions in the oil and fossil fuel industries realize that "renewable energy" as envisioned by some is not viable.  Some see that world energy needs cannot be met with just fossil fuels and therefore go into nuclear energy.  

There is more than enough energy for ALL people when done right.  No need to waste fuel like we are in engines that use 5 to 8 times more fuel than they should. 

New Engine type can allow 80-95% of the fuel to be gone in cars, thus making each gallon go 5-20 times further.  This allows poor people who could not use oil now due to cost per distance, to use it and afford it, thus opening up more customers for oil producer, but less per person.  

The entire world can run on the current oil supply with this New Engine Type, but not without it.  All of the Kyoto protocol goals for 2050 could be met with this tech without even resorting to and solar or wind technology, let alone fuel making.  

"Green" Side: These people make money by wind/solar PV/battery/EV technology that needs support of some sorts, whether via special contracts, subsidies, or taxes, to make up for the weakness and incompetence of their technology that can't and won't work. 

EVs are a classic case.  They got $7000/car tax credits.  They costed over $70k to start.  New Engine Type will cost LESS than current IC engines FROM THE START, without volume production.  Why?  Because it is the right solution. 

The "green" gangs claim that they can get to 100% "renewable energy" without oil or fuels.  They don't realize that fuels save them money and electro-fuels can be made from electricity.

The lack of viable technology in their patent portfolios make them want government hand outs and CO2 taxes that goes to them and their supporters via tax payers.  They need this money because their solution is not valid, nor cost effective.  

The basic problem is they fail to understand that the grid is a fuel based on-demand system.  They fail to see that their plan requires many times more wind and solar systems than would be needed with fuels.  This over capacity is one of the main reasons for the 60-160 cents/kwh insane costs that will result if they continue to deny reality.  Yes, they are the true denialists of the reality of how to get the CO2 out, if that is the goal...

This is all based on incorrect understanding of what CO2 does and devoid of any viable solution to their fictional problem of CO2.  

New Engine Type is the best solution to meet this non problem of CO2 that exists anywhere.  It is the lowest costs and quickest means to get the CO2 out.  

Notice that NOT one CO2 haters will debate this...  Why?  Because the New Engine Type will unplug their junk tech...

The end result is they will have to "build back better" which means they will have to super insulate houses due to the lack of performance and energy capture from this misguided nonsense tech they want to force onto people.  

PV solar is 14% and solar thermal is 70% capture.  This is a 5:1 difference.  The overbuild of this "green" grid is perhaps 3-4 times what a fuel based system needs.  During Summer when solar works well, the energy must be wasted, thus making it worse.  

PV panels do not work well in winter, and a grid based non fuel system needs several times more machines in Winter.  A fuel based system makes fuel on an AVERAGE basis and NOT on the worst case peak load in Winter.  In some area this could require up to 6 times more solar area and wind farms than would be needed with fuels.

What they fail to realize is fuels are key.  Until they wake up, they will fail, and at what cost?  $93 trillion wasted on junk and a bad idea?  This is the level of ignorance that abounds in the this scam.  Is the only recourse to sue them all into bankruptcy personally?  What will it take for them to get real and do basic engineering?

Third Way: New Engine Type technology provides solutions that both sides can agree on if they are honest and unbiased, which is rare indeed.  Clearly old oil interests and new "green" interests will not be making as much money as they thought.  

Both sides can make money if they would just open their minds, think, and realize New Engine Type tech is for everybody and there is a lot of money to save/make.  Bottom line is both sides cannot survive this New Engine Type tech without a major change in their positions and realization that the third way is the best way.

Summary: This page discusses the $93 Trillion dollar question everybody is talking about, but that none want to know a real solution for.  Why?  Money.  Follow the money.  It is hard to convince someone of something if their income/power/station in life is dependent on the new idea not being done.  Both sides don't want this New Engine Type, but both sides can have a victory by it and make a lot of money by realizing that the third way is key to their success.  

We will all be better off with the third way.  Oil will be fine and renewable energy will also be fine.  You can have your EV if you are in that cult, but you will realize how inferior it is to this New Engine Type and switch over.

Right now 25% of income is energy.  This New Engine type can make energy 3-5% of income.  We will all get a 20% pay increase, more freedom, cleaner air, more mobility, cleaner food and better and larger home living.  

In short, thinking people want real solutions, not expensive scams for elite criminals to get rich on.  People just need to listen and learn what the New Engine Type solution can do for them.  It is a full synergistic solution and not some unhealthy tech junk that is toxic in so many ways.  

There is money to be made by many and all on both sides of this debate.  Interest?  Read on.

With the New Engine Type, oil can be used for fuels such as gasoline, Diesel, Jet, and other varieties and mixes.  All existing fuel infrastructure based in oil works with it, except the amount of fuel needed is a lot less by 2-20 times.

To supply the world with oil at the USA consumption rate would require 5-6 times more oil, but with New Engine Type, 80-95% of the oil can be eliminated without even doing CO2 capture and fuel making.  Read that 1000 times.  Yes, without CO2 capture or RE.  

Until electro fuels and electro plastics are enabled via Thorium nuclear or other means, such as House Solar Thermal, the need for plastics from oil will remain.  The waste products of plastic making from oil are fuels.  

If you want the plastics from oil, you need to deal with the waste products of gasoline, Diesel, Kerosene, etc.  If you want to eliminate oil, you need electro fuels and plastics.

If you want Renewable Energy, you need fuels to do it.  Whether fuels come from oil or electro fuels, it does not matter for the grid.  

The key to RE is fuels, NOT batteries or EV.  Read 1000 times.  

Oils allow for fuels without needing the technology of electro-fuels.  Over time, oil can all be substituted for by electro fuels as they become cheaper and cheaper.  At some point, people will go with the cheaper electro-fuels and oil use will decline.  At that point there will be no need for oil.  That might take 20 to 100 years depending on whether we waste time and effort on batteries, wind, solar PV and EV junk, which rob electro-fuels of cash flow.  

All that is needed in the end in terms of RE is solar thermal, New Engine Type (or similar) and fuel making.  Nuclear would be great, but it too is NOT needed, nor will the grid be needed or survive if the "green" scam continues.  Keep up the insanity and there will be no grid...

This scam is about socialism, where a few idiots who don't have a clue about energy, take control of energy and force us all, via the grid, to make the few well connected very rich, and the masses very poor, without any transit or heating/cooling for homes and businesses.

Wind, solar PV, Batteries, and EV cannot get us to no CO2, but the claim is they can.  They all claim that if we just put more money into it, then it will all work.  If we just join the Paris accords it will all work out.  If we tax people we can do more R&D to have breakthroughs.  

These pleas of accords and taxes are ALL just scams to make the well connected rich.. There is no government money needed AT ALL to get the CO2 out, especially if New Engine Type tech is available.  

Why won't the Green New Deal work?  I explain it on the Green new Deal page.  https://newenginetype.com/why-green-new-deal-fails

The key is fuels and intermittent power.  The grid is a fuel based system on demand.  Energy storage is key and fuels can be stored for 15,000 times less costs than batteries.

A key is to make fuels Spring, Summer and Fall and store up for Winter when solar is nearly useless and wind does not blow.  This seasonal shift cannot be done with batteries, but it can with fuels, especially with liquid fuels.  You can make fuels such as Ethanol and methanol that will be all that is needed once the fuel needs are lowered by over 90%.

Every time someone claims they have to put a price on "carbon" they are telling you their junk does not work.  Nobody wants to "emit carbon" or such a thing.  They want something done as cheap as possible.  New Engine Type tech does just that. 

New Engine Type is NOT asking for any tax money, nor is such needed as it will fund itself via trucks and other means, and the cost is LESS than current IC engines due to many reasons.  

There is no need for wind or solar farms...NONE!  All energy can be made from New Engine Type tech on existing or new buildings.  This includes solar thermal + New Engine Type + fuel making + storage.  No fields need to be covered with PV panels and no forests need to be cut down for wind farms.

The toxic waste dumps and destroyed land from Solar PV panels will bankrupt all involved.  Everybody involved will be given legal notice soon by New Engine Type.  Heads up, you won't be successful.  

The "great reset" is not great and it not valid in any form as claimed by the cartel scammers promoting it.  It will destroy the planet with toxic junk that can't and won't work.  Most birds will be gone, as well as insects.  Lands will be toxic and unable to grow crops.  Forests will be destroyed and fires will get worse.  Why?  Because the scam does not work.  It is will only make the scammers rich at the expense of the world.

What will work?  Glad you asked...the third way

New Engine Type technology has 7 major parts to it that synergistically work together to solve many problems, not just torque to a wheel or propeller or electricity generation.  Some of the 7 parts below are for mobile applications, but not all of them.  Making fuel is only for the buildings.  Campers could have all of them, but not likely a fuel maker.  

The major parts are as follows:

1) New Engine Type 

2) Generator coupled to engine to make electricity

3) Solar thermal panels, as source of hot water

4) Solar thermal water storage as thermal battery

5) Fuel maker and CO2 recycling

6) Fuel storage, for use of fuels when needed

7) Water distillation, for reuse of water and sanitation

1) The core and starting point is the New Engine Type.  This is the heart of the system.  Without it, none of the other systems have much value.  The engine links all together and makes each a valuable part working together.

2) The generator can be a synchronous or asynchronous electric generator, as well as DC, depending on application.  It can be a conventional generator or a pancake light weight one.    Since there are 3 motors and two compressors per system, there can be different functions running at the same time, such as spin reserve.  A house/building application can have conventional generators, but a mobile application would want light weight pancake generators.  In a car application an electric motor can be used for slow speed movement if needed, but never as the main drive.

3) A new Type of Solar Thermal Panel is used to make renewable energy (hot water) for the engine to run on.  This hot water is injected into the engine to make torque which in turn torques an electrical generator to make electricity, just like current gensets do on the grid, but with hot water (not steam) AND fuel as the energy source.  

4) Solar Thermal Storage is a cheap way to store the waste energy from electricity generation from both hot water and fuels (combined heat and power) and to cover the large thermal loads found in buildings without using electricity or gas.  This hot water can also run the engine at night depending on the temperature in the hot water tank and ground plane temperature.  

5) Fuels can be made from electricity, water and CO2/N2.  This electricity made from solar Thermal is used in the house/building for electric loads during a solar day and can be used to make fuels, such as CH4 (methane), C3H8 (propane), C8H18 (octane/synthetic gasoline), and NH3 (Ammonia) and other Nitrogen based fuels.  

H2 is is not used in New Engine Type tech due to many reasons...It is not a valid fuel for any application due to burn properties, fire risks and storage issues.  Anybody who promotes it's use is not informed.

Fuel making is for long term energy storage longer than 3-5 days after thermal storage runs down.  CO2 generated by car/truck/airplane can be captured and returned to the house/building and turned into CH4, C3H8 or C8.  

6) Fuel storage can be in 3600 psi tanks for methane (CH4) and CO2 capture, a propane tank for propane or NH3, or a plastic tank for C8, Ethanol or methanol.  Oil fuels of gasoline/Diesel can use the plastic tanks should extra fuel be needed, or if no fuel maker is installed.

7) Water distillation is done by a vapor compression function of the compressor systems.  This requires equipment to handle the water and works with thermal storage to lower energy use for water reclaiming and reuse.

Overview:

This same tech that runs the house and makes fuel can be linked to cars, trucks and airplanes via the CO2 capture and fuel to thus allow cheap energy for them in the form of fuels.  This fuel use gives long ranges and high power in a light weight package.  The CO2 can be captured if wanted or needed, and returned to building to make new fuels from the CO2.  

The engine can be run several different ways:

1) Air breathing with N2 as working fluid with exhaust to air like a normal IC engine.  It can be installed with plastic tanks for simple liquid storage, Propane type tanks at 300-1800 psi rating, or use Natural Gas 1800-3600 psi tank for CH4 in an air cycle.  Propane tanks can also be used for NH3 for zero CO2 running on a air (N2) cycle.

2) With NG tanks, CO2 capture is enabled.  This would be run with a CO2 cycle and not an air (N2) cycle.  Fuel and oxygen must be injected.  This requires oxygen generator or a tank of O2 from the building.  A small tank allows for surges in power.  This can be done with liquid fuels like gasoline and propane or Natural Gas (CH4).  

A house owner can start small and piece by piece add to the system to allow in the end 100% RE for house and several cars/airplane/truck, depending on roof size.  This can be used in apartments (original application), office buildings, factories, and anywhere power is needed.

This New Engine Type solution allows much of the fuel needs in cars, trucks, airplanes and houses to be eliminated quickly from fossil fuel sources, allowing all the people of the world to have access to oil for those who don't have solar thermal panels and fuel makers.  The savings can allow investment into the entire system so that eventually all people can make their own fuel for their own use, thus eliminating more of the need for oil as a fuel over time.  

This engine tech in a car, Mini van, or truck can result in "skateboard" layouts that allows many body types to be attached to the main core engine system and fuel tanks.  This allows volume across many models with common engines and systems, thus making maintenance, training and costs much lower than current IC cars and likely 1/4 or less the cost of EVs.

Question: Why has someone not done this already?

Answer: The inventions for CO2 capture was made January 27th, 2021.  It is a new concept that needs lots of Research and Development work done.  Those interested in real solutions like the New Engine Type are welcome to discuss about how it works and how they can help.  

This technology can save over $1 trillion in fuel each year in the USA alone.  World wide is anybody's guess.  It can save the average American 10-20% of their income in energy costs.  It can make America the greatest manufacturing power house in the world with the lowest energy costs.  It complements oil and is at the core the only viable renewable energy solution on the internet.  It makes EVs obsolete...as well as batteries for drive loads and power walls.

Please submit your questions to contact@newenginetype.com